Paper detail

Online Packet Scheduling under Adversarial Jamming

We consider the problem of scheduling packets of different lengths via a directed communication link prone to jamming errors. Dynamic packet arrivals and errors are modelled by an adversary. We focus on estimating relative throughput of online scheduling algorithms, that is, the ratio between the throughputs achieved by the algorithm and the best scheduling for the same arrival and error patterns. This framework allows more accurate analysis of performance of online scheduling algorithms, even in worst-case arrival and error scenarios. We design an online algorithm for scheduling packets of arbitrary lengths, achieving optimal relative throughput in the range (1/3,1/2] (the exact value depends on packet lengths). In other words, for any arrival and jamming patterns, our solution gives throughput which is no more than c times worse than the best possible scheduling for these patters, where c in [2; 3) is the inverse of relative throughput. Another algorithm we design makes use of additional resources in order to achieve relative throughput 1, that is, it achieves at least as high throughput as the best schedule without such resources, for any arrival and jamming patterns. More precisely, we show that if the algorithm can run with double speed, i.e., with twice higher frequency, then its relative throughput is 1. This demonstrates that throughput of the best online scheduling algorithms scales well with resource augmentation. Keywords: Packet scheduling, Dynamic packet arrivals, Adversarial jamming, Online algorithms, Relative throughput, Resource augmentation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.