Paper detail

Online Distributed Scheduling on a Fault-prone Parallel System

We consider a parallel system of $m$ identical machines prone to unpredictable crashes and restarts, trying to cope with the continuous arrival of tasks to be executed. Tasks have different computational requirements (i.e., processing time or size). The flow of tasks, their size, and the crash and restart of the machines are assumed to be controlled by an adversary. Then, we focus on the study of online distributed algorithms for the efficient scheduling of the tasks. We use competitive analysis, considering as efficiency metric the completed-load, i.e., the aggregated size of the completed tasks. We first present optimal completed-load competitiveness algorithms when the number of different task sizes that can be injected by the adversary is bounded. (It is known that, if it is not bounded, competitiveness is not achievable.) We first consider only two different task sizes, and then proceed to $k$ different ones, showing in both cases that the optimal completed-load competitiveness can be achieved. Then, we consider the possibility of having some form of resource augmentation, allowing the scheduling algorithm to run with a speedup $s \geq 1$. In this case, we show that the competitiveness of all work-conserving scheduling algorithms can be increased by using a large enough speedup.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.