Paper detail

Online distributed algorithms for seeking generalized Nash equilibria in dynamic environments

In this paper, we study the distributed generalized Nash equilibrium seeking problem of non-cooperative games in dynamic environments. Each player in the game aims to minimize its own time-varying cost function subject to a local action set. The action sets of all players are coupled through a shared convex inequality constraint. Each player can only have access to its own cost function, its own set constraint and a local block of the inequality constraint, and can only communicate with its neighbours via a connected graph. Moreover, players do not have prior knowledge of their future cost functions. To address this problem, an online distributed algorithm is proposed based on consensus algorithms and a primal-dual strategy. Performance of the algorithm is measured by using dynamic regrets. Under mild assumptions on graphs and cost functions, we prove that if the deviation of variational generalized Nash equilibrium sequence increases within a certain rate, then the regrets, as well as the violation of inequality constraint, grow sublinearly. A simulation is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.