Paper detail

Online and Scalable Model Selection with Multi-Armed Bandits

Many online applications running on live traffic are powered by machine learning models, for which training, validation, and hyper-parameter tuning are conducted on historical data. However, it is common for models demonstrating strong performance in offline analysis to yield poorer performance when deployed online. This problem is a consequence of the difficulty of training on historical data in non-stationary environments. Moreover, the machine learning metrics used for model selection may not sufficiently correlate with real-world business metrics used to determine the success of the applications being tested. These problems are particularly prominent in the Real-Time Bidding (RTB) domain, in which ML models power bidding strategies, and a change in models will likely affect performance of the advertising campaigns. In this work, we present Automatic Model Selector (AMS), a system for scalable online selection of RTB bidding strategies based on real-world performance metrics. AMS employs Multi-Armed Bandits (MAB) to near-simultaneously run and evaluate multiple models against live traffic, allocating the most traffic to the best-performing models while decreasing traffic to those with poorer online performance, thereby minimizing the impact of inferior models on overall campaign performance. The reliance on offline data is avoided, instead making model selections on a case-by-case basis according to actionable business goals. AMS allows new models to be safely introduced into live campaigns as soon as they are developed, minimizing the risk to overall performance. In live-traffic tests on multiple ad campaigns, the AMS system proved highly effective at improving ad campaign performance.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.