Paper detail

One-shot Policy Elicitation via Semantic Reward Manipulation

Synchronizing expectations and knowledge about the state of the world is an essential capability for effective collaboration. For robots to effectively collaborate with humans and other autonomous agents, it is critical that they be able to generate intelligible explanations to reconcile differences between their understanding of the world and that of their collaborators. In this work we present Single-shot Policy Explanation for Augmenting Rewards (SPEAR), a novel sequential optimization algorithm that uses semantic explanations derived from combinations of planning predicates to augment agents' reward functions, driving their policies to exhibit more optimal behavior. We provide an experimental validation of our algorithm's policy manipulation capabilities in two practically grounded applications and conclude with a performance analysis of SPEAR on domains of increasingly complex state space and predicate counts. We demonstrate that our method makes substantial improvements over the state-of-the-art in terms of runtime and addressable problem size, enabling an agent to leverage its own expertise to communicate actionable information to improve another's performance.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.