Abstract
It is shown that the conclusion of the Comment by C.Barone et al. [J. Appl. Phys. Vol.115, 116101 (2014)] on the paper [J. Appl. Phys. Vol.113, 094901 (2013)] is a result of several flaws including incorrect assumption that the charge carrier mobility in La_2/3Sr_1/3MnO_3 is independent of temperature, and misinterpretation of the quantum theory of flicker noise. An experimental evidence for strong temperature dependence of the carrier mobility in the metallic state of manganites is given, and prospects for explaining the experimental data given in the Comment are discussed.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.