Paper detail

On well-posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the critical case

In this paper we study the well-posedness for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation $i\partial_{t}u+Δu=λ|x|^{-α}|u|^βu$ in Sobolev spaces $H^s$, $s\geq0$. The well-posedness theory for this model has been intensively studied in recent years, but much less is understood compared to the classical NLS model where $α=0$. The conventional approach does not work particularly for the critical cases $β=\frac{4-2α}{d-2s}$. It is still an open problem. The main contribution of this paper is to develop the well-posedness theory in this critical case (as well as non-critical cases). To this end, we approach to the matter in a new way based on a weighted $L^p$ setting which seems to be more suitable to perform a finer analysis for this model. This is because it makes it possible to handle the singularity $|x|^{-α}$ in the nonlinearity more effectively. This observation is a core of our approach that covers the critical case successfully.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.