Paper detail

On Understanding and Mitigating the Dimensional Collapse of Graph Contrastive Learning: a Non-Maximum Removal Approach

Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) has shown promising performance in graph representation learning (GRL) without the supervision of manual annotations. GCL can generate graph-level embeddings by maximizing the Mutual Information (MI) between different augmented views of the same graph (positive pairs). However, the GCL is limited by dimensional collapse, i.e., embedding vectors only occupy a low-dimensional subspace. In this paper, we show that the smoothing effect of the graph pooling and the implicit regularization of the graph convolution are two causes of the dimensional collapse in GCL. To mitigate the above issue, we propose a non-maximum removal graph contrastive learning approach (nmrGCL), which removes "prominent'' dimensions (i.e., contribute most in similarity measurement) for positive pair in the pre-text task. Comprehensive experiments on various benchmark datasets are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of nmrGCL, and the results show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Source code will be made publicly available.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.