Paper detail

On Training and Evaluation of Neural Network Approaches for Model Predictive Control

The contribution of this paper is a framework for training and evaluation of Model Predictive Control (MPC) implemented using constrained neural networks. Recent studies have proposed to use neural networks with differentiable convex optimization layers to implement model predictive controllers. The motivation is to replace real-time optimization in safety critical feedback control systems with learnt mappings in the form of neural networks with optimization layers. Such mappings take as the input the state vector and predict the control law as the output. The learning takes place using training data generated from off-line MPC simulations. However, a general framework for characterization of learning approaches in terms of both model validation and efficient training data generation is lacking in literature. In this paper, we take the first steps towards developing such a coherent framework. We discuss how the learning problem has similarities with system identification, in particular input design, model structure selection and model validation. We consider the study of neural network architectures in PyTorch with the explicit MPC constraints implemented as a differentiable optimization layer using CVXPY. We propose an efficient approach of generating MPC input samples subject to the MPC model constraints using a hit-and-run sampler. The corresponding true outputs are generated by solving the MPC offline using OSOP. We propose different metrics to validate the resulting approaches. Our study further aims to explore the advantages of incorporating domain knowledge into the network structure from a training and evaluation perspective. Different model structures are numerically tested using the proposed framework in order to obtain more insights in the properties of constrained neural networks based MPC.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.