Paper detail

On the use of light polarization to investigate the size, shape and refractive index dependence of backscattering Angstroem exponents

In this letter, we exploit the polarization property of light to investigate the Angstroem exponent describing the wavelength dependence of optical backscatter between two wavelengths. Where previous interpretation of Angstroem exponent was that of a particles size indicator, the use of light polarization makes it possible to investigate the Angstroem exponent dependence on the particles shape by separately retrieving the backscattering Angstroem exponent of the spherical and nonspherical particles contained in an atmospheric particle mixture. As an output, analytical solutions of the Maxwell equations, Lorenz Mie theory, spheroidal model,can then be applied to investigate the Angstroem exponent dependence on the particles size and complex refractive index for each assigned shape. Interestingly, lidar retrieved vertical profiles of backscattering Angstroem exponents specific to s and ns particles can be used by the optical community to evaluate a range of involved particles sizes and complex refractive indices for both particles shapes, spherical and nonspherical, as we remotely demonstrate on a case study dedicated to a dust nucleation event.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.