Paper detail

On the use of eddy viscosity in resolvent analysis of turbulent channel flow

The predictions of resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow are evaluated for a friction Reynolds number of Retau = 550. In addition to the standard resolvent operator with kinematic viscosity, a resolvent operator augmented with the Cess eddy viscosity is considered. Adding eddy viscosity significantly alters the low-rank behavior of the resolvent. Regardless of the wave speed selected, the eddy resolvent is low-rank for spanwise wavelengths of ly+ = 80 and ly/h = 3.5 in comparison to the standard resolvent whose low-rank behavior depends on the wave speed. The leading eddy modes have higher projections onto the leading mode from spectral proper orthogonal decomposition in comparison to standard resolvent modes. Neither analysis, however, reliably predicts the most energetic wave speed. The standard resolvent tends to overestimate it while the eddy resolvent underestimates it. When the most energetic wave speed is underestimated, the eddy modes are energetic too close to the wall. The eddy resolvent does, however, correctly identify the most energetic wave speed and mode shapes for structures associated with the near-wall cycle or that are most energetic at z/h = 0.5. These structures are likely to be correctly predicted for any friction Reynolds number due to the scaling of the Cess eddy viscosity profile. Finally, it is shown that the accuracy of eddy predictions relies on the right balance between positive and negative energy transfers. Even though eddy viscosity primarily adds dissipation, its wall-normal gradient injects energy in the near-wall region, resulting in mode shapes that are attached to the wall. For some scales the predicted positive energy transfer is too strong thus biasing structures towards the wall. The ability of the Cess eddy viscosity profile to model both positive and negative energy transfers suggests that it could be optimized for individual scales.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.