Researcher profile

Anagha Madhusudanan

Anagha Madhusudanan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the use of eddy viscosity in resolvent analysis of turbulent channel flow

The predictions of resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow are evaluated for a friction Reynolds number of Retau = 550. In addition to the standard resolvent operator with kinematic viscosity, a resolvent operator augmented with the Cess eddy viscosity is considered. Adding eddy viscosity significantly alters the low-rank behavior of the resolvent. Regardless of the wave speed selected, the eddy resolvent is low-rank for spanwise wavelengths of ly+ = 80 and ly/h = 3.5 in comparison to the standard resolvent whose low-rank behavior depends on the wave speed. The leading eddy modes have higher projections onto the leading mode from spectral proper orthogonal decomposition in comparison to standard resolvent modes. Neither analysis, however, reliably predicts the most energetic wave speed. The standard resolvent tends to overestimate it while the eddy resolvent underestimates it. When the most energetic wave speed is underestimated, the eddy modes are energetic too close to the wall. The eddy resolvent does, however, correctly identify the most energetic wave speed and mode shapes for structures associated with the near-wall cycle or that are most energetic at z/h = 0.5. These structures are likely to be correctly predicted for any friction Reynolds number due to the scaling of the Cess eddy viscosity profile. Finally, it is shown that the accuracy of eddy predictions relies on the right balance between positive and negative energy transfers. Even though eddy viscosity primarily adds dissipation, its wall-normal gradient injects energy in the near-wall region, resulting in mode shapes that are attached to the wall. For some scales the predicted positive energy transfer is too strong thus biasing structures towards the wall. The ability of the Cess eddy viscosity profile to model both positive and negative energy transfers suggests that it could be optimized for individual scales.