Paper detail

On the usage of randomized p-values in the Schweder-Spjotvoll estimator

We are concerned with multiple test problems with composite null hypotheses and the estimation of the proportion $π_{0}$ of true null hypotheses. The Schweder-Spjøtvoll estimator $\hatπ_0$ utilizes marginal $p$-values and only works properly if the $p$-values that correspond to the true null hypotheses are uniformly distributed on $[0,1]$ ($\mathrm{Uni}[0,1]$-distributed). In the case of composite null hypotheses, marginal $p$-values are usually computed under least favorable parameter configurations (LFCs). Thus, they are stochastically larger than $\mathrm{Uni}[0,1]$ under non-LFCs in the null hypotheses. When using these LFC-based $p$-values, $\hatπ_0$ tends to overestimate $π_{0}$. We introduce a new way of randomizing $p$-values that depends on a tuning parameter $c\in[0,1]$, such that $c=0$ and $c=1$ lead to $\mathrm{Uni}[0,1]$-distributed $p$-values, which are independent of the data, and to the original LFC-based $p$-values, respectively. For a certain value $c=c^{\star}$ the bias of $\hatπ_0$ is minimized when using our randomized $p$-values. This often also entails a smaller mean squared error of the estimator as compared to the usage of the LFC-based $p$-values. We analyze these points theoretically, and we demonstrate them numerically in computer simulations under various standard statistical models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.