Paper detail

On the Upper Ocean Turbulent Dissipation Rate due to Very Short Breaking Wind-Waves

Sutherland and Melville (2015a) investigated the relative contributions to the total dissipation rate in the ocean surface wave boundary layer of different breaking wave scales, from large-scale whitecaps to micro-breakers. Based on their measurements of geometric/kinematic properties of breaking waves for a wide range of wave ages, they inferred the dissipation rates from breaking as a function of scale. These results were compared with their complementary measurements of the total dissipation rate in the underlying wave boundary layer. They reported that the total depth-integrated dissipation rate in the water column agreed well with dissipation rate from breaking waves for young to very old wind seas. They also reported high observed levels of dissipation rate very near the sea surface. They concluded that this showed a large fraction of the total dissipation rate was due to non-air entraining micro-breakers and very small whitecaps. Because of its fundamental importance, both physically and for accurate air-sea interaction modeling, we assess the validity of these conclusions. Our analysis of their data shows that the microbreakers and small whitecaps do not make a significant contribution to the total turbulent dissipation rate in the wave boundary layer.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.