Paper detail

On the true energy budget of GRB970508 and 981214

We emphasize a that since GRB970508 released an energy of Q_g~10^{51} Ωergs in soft gamma rays alone, the actual energy of the e^+e^- p FB driving the blast wave could be considerably higher than this value, Q_{FB} >Q_g. For reasonably large values of Ω, as is probably suggested by the radio observations, the value of Q_{FB} ~ 5.10^{51}~t_m^3~n_1 erg, for GRB970508; here t_m is the epoch in months when the associated radio-blastwave degrades to become mildly relativistic. We discuss that it is unlikely that this energy, Q_{FB}~sim 10^{53}erg was liberated by the central engine by a direct electromagnetic mode. On the other hand, as conceived by several previous authors and as is suggested by supernova theories, their FB driving the blast wave is likely to be preceded by a much stronger neutrino burst: ν+ anti ν- e^+ +e^-. Although, the efficiency for pair production by this latter route is usually found to be as low as ~.001, we point out that for very high values of neutrino energy release Q_ν>Q_{FB}, it is possible that, its value increses substantially. By considering that, the value of $Q_{FB}$ for such GRBs is indeed ~sim 10^{53} erg, we envisage that the energy of the actual neutrino burst/wind could be as high as ~ 10^{54-55} erg. This energy might be had from general relativistic collapse of a massive stellar core having INITIAL gravitational mass, say, M_i~ few~M_sun to a stage having a potential well much deeper than what is present on a canonican neutron star surface. Accordingly, we predict that the new generation large nu elescopes may detect neutrino burst of energy ~10^{54-55} ergs, with neutrino energies touching ~ 1 GeV, in coincidence with GRBs.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.