BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Abhas Mitra

Abhas Mitra appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
gr-qcastro-phphysics.gen-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

Catalog footprint

What is connected

15works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Gamma/hadron segregation for a ground based imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescope using machine learning methods: Random Forest leads

A detailed case study of $γ$-hadron segregation for a ground based atmospheric Cherenkov telescope is presented. We have evaluated and compared various supervised machine learning methods such as the Random Forest method, Artificial Neural Network, Linear Discriminant method, Naive Bayes Classifiers,Support Vector Machines as well as the conventional dynamic supercut method by simulating triggering events with the Monte Carlo method and applied the results to a Cherenkov telescope. It is demonstrated that the Random Forest method is the most sensitive machine learning method for $γ$-hadron segregation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Validation of a new background discrimination method for the TACTIC TeV $γ$-ray telescope with Markarian 421 data

This paper describes the validation of a new background discrimination method based on Random Forest technique by re-analysing the Markarian 421 (Mrk 421) observations performed by the TACTIC (TeV Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope with Imaging Camera) gamma-ray telescope. The Random Forest technique is a flexible multivariate method which combines Bagging and Random Split Selection to construct a large collection of decision trees and then combines them to construct a common classifier. Markarian 421 in a high state was observed by TACTIC during December 07, 2005 - April 30, 2006 for 202 h. Previous analysis of this data led to a detection of flaring activity from the source at Energy $ >$ 1 TeV. Within this data set, a spell of 97 h revealed strong detection of a gamma-ray signal with daily flux of > 1 Crab unit on several days. Here we re-analyze this spell as well as the data from the entire observation period with the Random Forest method. Application of this method led to an improvement in the signal detection strength by $\sim 26\%$ along with a $\sim 18\%$ increase in detected $γ$ rays compared to the conventional Dynamic Supercuts method. The resultant differential spectrum obtained is represented by a power law with an exponential cut off $Γ= -2.51 \pm 0.10$ and $E_{0} = 4.71 \pm 2.20$ TeV. Such a spectrum is consistent with previously reported results and justifies the use of Random Forest method for analyzing data from atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Low frequency radio spectrum of LS 5039 during periastron and apastron passages

We have recently studied LS 5039, a gamma-ray binary, with Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope (GMRT) during its periastron and apastron passage. The results presented here show that the spectra are inverted at the low frequency and the flux densities do not differ significantly for two different orbital phases. Assuming that the free-free absorption of radio in stellar wind environment is responsible for the optically thick radio emission we calculated the free-free absorption optical depth and constrained the height of the radio emitting region from the orbital plane. The height is found to be around 1.6 AU for a spherical stellar wind geometry. This estimate may change if the stellar wind is focussed or the radio absorption is due to synchrotron self-absorption.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Macroscopic form of the first law of thermodynamics for an adiabatically evolving non-singular self-gravitating fluid

We emphasize that the pressure related work appearing in a general relativistic first law of thermodynamics should involve {\em proper volume element} rather than coordinate volume element. This point is highlighted by considering both local energy momentum conservation equation as well as particle number conservation equation. It is also emphasized that we are considering here a {\em non-singular} fluid governed by purely classical general relativity. Therefore, we are not considering here any semi-classical or quantum gravity which apparently suggests thermodynamical properties even for a (singular) black hole. Having made such a clarification, we formulate a global first law of thermodynamics for an adiabatically evolving spherical perfect fluid. It may be verified that such a global first law of thermodynamics, {\em for a non-singular fluid}, has not been formulated earlier.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Likely formation of general relativistic radiation pressure supported stars or "eternally collapsing objects"

Hoyle and Folwler showed that there could be Radiation Pressure Supported Stars (RPSS) even in Newtonian gravity. Much later, Mitra found that one could also conceive of their General Relativistic (GR) version, "Relativistic Radiation Pressure Supported Stars" (RRPSSs). While RPSSs have $z\ll 1$, RRPSSs have $z \gg 1$, where $z$ is the surface gravitational redshift. Here we elaborate on the formation of RRPSSs during continued gravitational collapse by recalling that a contracting massive star must start trapping radiation as it would enter its {\em photon sphere}. It is found that, irrespective of the details of the contraction process, the trapped radiation flux should attain the corresponding Eddington value at sufficiently large $z\gg 1$. This means that continued GR collapse may generate an intermediate RRPSS with $z\gg 1$ before a true BH state with $z=\infty$ is formed asymptotically. An exciting consequence of this is that the stellar mass black hole candidates, at present epoch, should be hot balls of quark gluon plasma, as has been discussed by Royzen in a recent article entitled "{\it QCD against black holes?}".

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

No uniform density star in general relativity

As per general relativity (GR), there cannot be any superluminal propagation of energy. And thus, the sound speed in a continuous medium, $c_s=\sqrt{dp/dρ}$, must be subluminal. However, if one would conceive of a {\em homogeneous} fluid, one would have $c_s=\infty$ unless pressure too would be homogeneous. Thus it is universally accepted that the maiden GR interior solution obtained by Schwarzschild, involving a homogeneous fluid having a boundary, is unphysical. However no one has ever shown how this exact solution is in reality devoid of physical reality. Also, this solution is universally used for approximate modelling of general relativistic stars and compact objects. But here first we show that in order that the Kretschmann scalar is continuous, one should have $ρ=0$ for strictly homogeneous static stars. Further, by invoking the fact that in GR, given one time label $t$ one can choose another time label $t_*=f(t)$ {\em without any loss of generality}, we obtain the same result that for a static homogeneous sphere $ρ=0$. Consequently, it is eventually found that the static homogeneous sphere having a boundary is just part of the vacuum where $c_s=0$ rather than $\infty$. Therefore all general relativistic stars must be inhomogeneous.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The fallacy of Oppenheimer Snyder Collapse: no general relativistic Collapse at all, no black hole, no physical singularity

By applying Birkhoff's theorem to the problem of the general relativistic collapse of a uniform density dust, we directly show that the density of the dust $ρ=0$ even when its proper number density $n$ would be assumed to be finite! The physical reason behind this exact result can be traced back to the observation of Arnowitt et al. that the gravitational mass of a neutral point particle is zero: $m=0$ (PRL, 4, 375, 1960). And since, a dust is a mere collection of {\em neutral point particles, unlike a continuous hydrodynamic fluid}, its density $ρ= m n=0$. It is nonetheless found that for $k=-1$, a homogeneous dust can collapse and expand special relativistically in the fashion of a Milne universe. Thus, in reality, general relativistic homogeneous dust collapse does not lead to the formation of any black hole in conformity of many previous studies (Logunov, Mestverishvili, Kiselev, Phys.Part.Nucl. 37, 317, 2006; Kisevev, Logunov & Mestvirishvili, Theor. Math. Phys., 164, 972, 2010; Mitra, J. Math. Phys. 50, 042502, 2009; Suggett, J. Phys. A, 12, 375 1979). Interestingly, this result is in agreement with the intuition of Oppenheimer & Snyder (Phys. Rev. 56, p.456, 1939) too: "Physically such a singularity would mean that the expressions used for the energy-momentum tensor does not take into account some essential physical fact which would really smooth the singularity out. Further, a star in its early stages of development would not possess a singular density or pressure, it is impossible for a singularity to develop in a finite time."

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Comments on "The Euclidean gravitational action as black hole entropy, singularities, and spacetime voids" by C. Castro, J. Math. Phys., 49, 042501, 2008

We point out that the {\em spacetime void} inferred by Castro[J. Math. Phys. 49, 042501, (2008)] results from his choice of a discontinuous radial gauge. Further since the integration constant $α_0 = 2M_0$ ($G=c=1$) occurring in the vacuum Hilbert/Schwarzschild solution of a neutral "point mass" is zero [Arnowitt et al., in Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, ed. L. Witten, Wiley, Chap. 7, p.227; also Phys. Rev. Lett., 4, 375, (1960)]; A. Mitra, Adv. Sp. Res., 38, 2917 (2006)] Castro's gauge reduces to the well behaved and physical Hilbert gauge. Physically this means that true Hilbert/Schwarzschild black holes have unique gravitational mass M=0. Accordingly, the unphysical {\em spacetime viod} inferred by Castro is actually non-existent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Einstein energy associated with the Friedmann -Robertson -Walker metric

Following Einstein's definition of Lagrangian density and gravitational field energy density (Einstein, A., Ann. Phys. Lpz., 49, 806 (1916); Einstein, A., Phys. Z., 19, 115 (1918); Pauli, W., {\it Theory of Relativity}, B.I. Publications, Mumbai, 1963, Trans. by G. Field), Tolman derived a general formula for the total matter plus gravitational field energy ($P_0$) of an arbitrary system (Tolman, R.C., Phys. Rev., 35(8), 875 (1930); Tolman, R.C., {\it Relativity, Thermodynamics & Cosmology}, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962)); Xulu, S.S., arXiv:hep-th/0308070 (2003)). For a static isolated system, in quasi-Cartesian coordinates, this formula leads to the well known result $P_0 = \int \sqrt{-g} (T_0^0 - T_1^1 -T_2^2 -T_3^3) ~d^3 x$, where $g$ is the determinant of the metric tensor and $T^a_b$ is the energy momentum tensor of the {\em matter}. Though in the literature, this is known as "Tolman Mass", it must be realized that this is essentially "Einstein Mass" because the underlying pseudo-tensor here is due to Einstein. In fact, Landau -Lifshitz obtained the same expression for the "inertial mass" of a static isolated system without using any pseudo-tensor at all and which points to physical significance and correctness of Einstein Mass (Landau, L.D., and Lifshitz, E.M., {\it The Classical Theory of Fields}, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2th ed., 1962)! For the first time we apply this general formula to find an expression for $P_0$ for the Friedmann- Robertson -Walker (FRW) metric by using the same quasi-Cartesian basis. As we analyze this new result, physically, a spatially flat model having no cosmological constant is suggested. Eventually, it is seen that conservation of $P_0$ is honoured only in the a static limit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Quantum Information Paradox: Real or Fictitious?

One of the outstanding puzzles of theoretical physics is whether quantum information indeed gets lost in the case of Black Hole (BH) evaporation or accretion. Let us recall that Quantum Mechanics (QM) demands an upper limit on the acceleration of a test particle. On the other hand, it is pointed out here that, if a Schwarzschild BH would exist, the acceleration of the test particle would blow up at the event horizon in violation of QM. Thus the concept of an exact BH is in contradiction of QM and quantum gravity (QG). It is also reminded that the mass of a BH actually appears as an INTEGRATION CONSTANT of Einstein equations. And it has been shown that the value of this integration constant is actually zero. Thus even classically, there cannot be finite mass BHs though zero mass BH is allowed. It has been further shown that during continued gravitational collapse, radiation emanating from the contracting object gets trapped within it by the runaway gravitational field. As a consequence, the contracting body attains a quasi-static state where outward trapped radiation pressure gets balanced by inward gravitational pull and the ideal classical BH state is never formed in a finite proper time. In other words, continued gravitational collapse results in an "Eternally Collapsing Object" which is a ball of hot plasma and which is asymptotically approaching the true BH state with M=0 after radiating away its entire mass energy. And if we include QM, this contraction must halt at a radius suggested by highest QM acceleration. In any case no EH is ever formed and in reality, there is no quantum information paradox.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Does Pressure Increase or Decrease Active Gravitational Mass Density?

It is known that, for a static fluid sphere, the GeneralRelativistic (GR) Effective Mass Energy Density (EMD) appears to be (rho + 3 p), where rho is the bare mass density, p is the isotropic pressure, from a purely localized view point. But since there is no truly local definition of ``gravitational field'', such a notion could actually be misleading. On the other hand, by using the Tolman mass formula, we point out that, from a global perspective, the Active Gravitational Mass Energy Density (AGMD) is sqrt{g_{00}} (rho + 3 p) and which is obviously smaller than (rho + 3p) because g_{00} < 1. Then we show that the AGMD eventually is (rho - 3p), i.e., exactly opposite to what is generally believed. We further identify the AGMD to be proportional to the Ricci Scalar. By using this fundamental and intersting property, we obtain the GR virial theorem in terms of appropriate ``proper energies''.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Why the astrophysical Black Hole Candidates may not be black holes at all

In a recent paper[1], it has been shown that, there cannot be any rotating (Kerr) Black Hole (BH) with finite mass in order that the generic properties associated with the symmetries of stationary axisymmetric Einstein equations are obeyed, i.e, in order to have m\ge 0, we must have $a=0$. In other words, all observed chargeless BHs with finite masses must be non-rotating Schwarzschild BHs. Here, by comparing the invariant 4 volume associated with original Kerr metric [2] with the Boyer-Lindquist version of the same [3], we further find that, stationary axisymmetric {\em vacuum} Einstein solutions actually correspond to m=0 in addition to a=0! This means that if the Kerr solution is a unique one, the Schwarzschild BHs too correspond to only m=0 and therefore the observed BH candidates (BHs) with m >0 are not BHs at all. This is in agreement some detailed analysis of recent observations[4-7] which suggest the the BHCs have strong intrinsic magnetic moment rather than any Event Horizon. If one would derive the Boyer-Lindquist metric in a straightforward manner by using the Backlund transformation, it would follow that a= m sin phi, where phi is the azimuth angle. This relationship directly confirms the result that for a supposed rotating BH, actually, both a=m=0.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

On the Final State of Spherical Gravitational Collapse

In a recent paper (FPL 13(6), 543, 2000, astro-ph/9910408), from several independent considerations we showed that GTR does not allow formation of trapped surfaces and finite mass BHs. We rediscuss here several subtle issues involved in this work. So far only the scientific critique to this work was due to Tereno (astro-ph/9905144, astro-ph/9905298) and which was answered in Mitra (astro-ph/9905175, astro-ph/9905175, astro-ph/9905329). Now Tereno (gr-qc/0111073) has also admitted that the local 3-speed of a free particle as conventionally defined by all previous authors and as measured in any coordinate system, is indeed c at the EH. Further since the acceleration SCALAR BLOWS UP at the EH, our result that there cannot be any EH at a finite R is reconfirmed. We explicitly show here that the final state of spherical collapse of very massive stars corresponds to a zero mass BH with 2M/R ->0. But at any finite epoch there would be a Eternally Collapsing Objects (ECO) of finite mass. However, if quantum back reaction in the strong gravity regime would cause a phase transition p ~ rho, there could be static ultracompact objects (UCO) of ~ 10 M (solar). Further, if the phase transition goes proceeds to p= -rho, there could be UCOs of arbitrary high mass (Mazur & Mottola, astro-ph/0109035). Both ECOs and UCOs are expected to possess strong internal magnetic field whereas the the same for a BH is zero. Robertson & Leiter (ApJ 565, 447, 2002, astro-ph/0102381) have shown that the BH candiadates may indeed possess such strong intrinsic mag field. Thus the BHCs are likely to ECOs/UCOs rather than BHs. We also discuss that there is no real evidence for detection of EH.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2000arXiv

Comments on the paper ``Polarimetric Constraints on the Optical Afterglow Emission from GRB 990123'' by Hjorth et al. (Science, 26 1999)

GRB 990123 is the most luminous event detected so far, and in an important paper, Hjorth et al. (1999) reported an upper limit on the degree of linear polarization of the optical afterglow for this burst (P <2.3%). One of the interprtations for this small value of P was that the emission was probably due a relativistic jet with ordered magnetic field, and the viewing angle in the lab frame theta' <= Gamma^{-1}, where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor of the jet at the time of the optical emission. We point out that this conclusion resulted from a confusion between the angles measured in the lab frame and in the plasma rest frame. For ordered magnetic field, one would actually obtain a large value of P because the above mentioned angle would correspond to a very large angle, theta <= π/2, in the plasma rest frame. And this is probably the case with the blazars. On the other hand, it is indeed possible to have P ~ 0 if the magnetic field of GRB 990123 was completely chaotic and the viewing angle was considerably smaller than the semi-angle of the jet.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1998arXiv

On the true energy budget of GRB970508 and 981214

We emphasize a that since GRB970508 released an energy of Q_g~10^{51} Ωergs in soft gamma rays alone, the actual energy of the e^+e^- p FB driving the blast wave could be considerably higher than this value, Q_{FB} >Q_g. For reasonably large values of Ω, as is probably suggested by the radio observations, the value of Q_{FB} ~ 5.10^{51}~t_m^3~n_1 erg, for GRB970508; here t_m is the epoch in months when the associated radio-blastwave degrades to become mildly relativistic. We discuss that it is unlikely that this energy, Q_{FB}~sim 10^{53}erg was liberated by the central engine by a direct electromagnetic mode. On the other hand, as conceived by several previous authors and as is suggested by supernova theories, their FB driving the blast wave is likely to be preceded by a much stronger neutrino burst: ν+ anti ν- e^+ +e^-. Although, the efficiency for pair production by this latter route is usually found to be as low as ~.001, we point out that for very high values of neutrino energy release Q_ν>Q_{FB}, it is possible that, its value increses substantially. By considering that, the value of $Q_{FB}$ for such GRBs is indeed ~sim 10^{53} erg, we envisage that the energy of the actual neutrino burst/wind could be as high as ~ 10^{54-55} erg. This energy might be had from general relativistic collapse of a massive stellar core having INITIAL gravitational mass, say, M_i~ few~M_sun to a stage having a potential well much deeper than what is present on a canonican neutron star surface. Accordingly, we predict that the new generation large nu elescopes may detect neutrino burst of energy ~10^{54-55} ergs, with neutrino energies touching ~ 1 GeV, in coincidence with GRBs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access