Paper detail

On the Transversal Number and VC-Dimension of Families of Positive Homothets of a Convex Body

Let F be a family of positive homothets (or translates) of a given convex body K in R^n. We investigate two approaches to measuring the complexity of F. First, we find an upper bound on the transversal number $τ(F)$ of F in terms of $n$ and the independence number $ν(F)$. This question is motivated by a problem of Grünbaum. Our bound $τ(F)\le 2^n \binom{2n}{n} (n \log n + \log\log n + 5n) ν(F)$ is exponential in n, an improvement from the previously known bound of Kim, Nakprasit, Pelsmajer and Skokan, which was of order n^n. By a lower bound, we show that the right order of magnitude is exponential in n. Next, we consider another measure of complexity, the Vapnik--Chervonenkis dimension of F. We prove that this quantity is at most 3 if n=2 and is infinite for some F if n>2. This settles a conjecture of Günbaum: Show that the maximum dual VC-dimension of a family of positive homothets of a given convex body K in R^n is n+1. This conjecture was disproved by Naiman and Wynn, who constructed a counterexample of dual VC-dimension $\lfloor 3n/2\rfloor$. Our result implies that no upper bound exists.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.