On the thin boundary of the fat attractor

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

For, 0<λ<10<λ<1, consider the transformation T(x)=dxT(x) = d x (mod 1) on the circle S1S^1, a C1C^1 function A:S1→RA:S^1 \to \mathbb{R}, and, the map F(x,s)=(T(x),λ s+A(x))F(x,s) = ( T(x) , λ\, s + A(x)), (x,s)∈S1×R(x,s)\in S^1 \times \mathbb{R}. We denote B=Bλ\mathcal{B}= \mathcal{B}_λ the upper boundary of the attractor (known as fat attractor). We are interested in the regularity of Bλ\mathcal{B}_λ, and, also in what happens in the limit when λ→1λ\to 1. We also address the analysis of the following conjecture which were proposed by R. Bamón, J. Kiwi, J. Rivera-Letelier and R. Urzúa: for any fixed λλ, C1C^1 generically on the potential AA, the upper boundary Bλ\mathcal{B}_λ is formed by a finite number of pieces of smooth unstable manifolds of periodic orbits for FF. We show the proof of the conjecture for the class of C2C^2 potentials A(x)A(x) satisfying the twist condition (plus a combinatorial condition). We do not need the generic hypothesis for this result. We present explicit examples. On the other hand, when λλ is close to 11 and the potential AA is generic a more precise description can be done. In this case the finite number of pieces of C1C^1 curves on the boundary have some special properties. Having a finite number of pieces on this boundary is an important issue in a problem related to semi-classical limits and micro-support. This was consider in a recent published work by A. Lopes and J. Mohr. Finally, we present the general analysis of the case where AA is Lipschitz and its relation with Ergodic Transport

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.