Paper detail

On the structure of singular points of a solution to Newton's least resistance problem

We consider the following problem stated in 1993 by Buttazzo and Kawohl: minimize the functional $\int\!\!\int_Ω(1 + |\nabla u(x,y)|^2)^{-1} dx\, dy$ in the class of concave functions $u: Ω\to [0,M]$, where $Ω\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ is a convex domain and $M > 0$. It generalizes the classical minimization problem, which was initially stated by I. Newton in 1687 in the more restricted class of radial functions. The problem is not solved until now; there is even nothing known about the structure of singular points of a solution. In this paper we, first, solve a family of auxiliary 2D least resistance problems and, second, apply the obtained results to study singular points of a solution to our original problem. More precisely, we derive a necessary condition for a point being a ridge singular point of a solution and prove, in particular, that all ridge singular points with horizontal edge lie on the top level and zero level sets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.