Paper detail

On the standing waves for the X-ray free electron laser Schrödinger equation

In this paper, we are concerned with the standing waves for the following nonlinear Schrödinger equation $$i\partial_{t}ψ=-Δψ+b^2(x_1^2+x_2^2)ψ+\frac{λ_1}{|x|}ψ+ λ_2(|\cdot|^{-1}\ast |ψ|^2)ψ- λ_3|ψ|^p ψ,~~~ (t,x)\in \mathbb{R}^+\times \mathbb{R}^3,$$ where $0<p<4$. We mainly study the existence and stability/instability properties of standing waves for this equation, in two cases: the first one is that no magnetic potential is involved, (i.e. $b=0$ in the equation) and the second one is that $b\neq 0$. To be precise, in the first case, by considering a minimization problem on a suitable Pohozaev manifold we prove the existence of ground states, and show further that all ground state standing waves are strongly unstable by blow-up in finite time. Moreover, by making use of the ideas of their proofs, we are able to prove the existence and instability of normalized solutions, whose proofs seem to be new, compared with the studies of normalized solutions in the existing literature. In the second case, the situation is more difficult to be treated, due to the additional term of the partial harmonic potential. We manage to prove the existence of stable standing waves for $p\in (0,4)$ and with some assumptions on the coefficients, where solutions are obtained as global minimizers if $p\in (0,\frac{4}{3}]$, and as local minimizers if $p\in [\frac{4}{3}, 4)$. In the mass-critical and supercritical cases $p\in [\frac{4}{3}, 4)$, we establish the variational characterization of the ground states on a suitable manifold which is different from the one neither of the Nehari type nor of the Pohozaev type, and then prove the existence of ground states. Finally under some assumptions on $ω$ and $p$, we prove that the ground state standing waves are strongly unstable.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.