Paper detail

On the square root of Poisson kernel in $δ$-hyperbolic spaces and some aspects of boundary representations

In this note, we prove a theorem à la Fatou for the square root of Poisson Kernel in the context of quasi-convex cocompact discrete groups of isometries of $δ$-hyperbolic spaces. As a corollary we show that some matrix coefficients of boundary representations cannot satisfy \emph{the weak inequality of Harish-Chandra}. Nevertheless, such matrix coefficients satisfy an inequality which can be viewed as a particular case of the inequality coming from \emph{property RD} for boundary representations. The inequality established in this paper is based on a uniform bound which appears in the proof of the irreducibility of boundary representations. Moreover this uniform bound can be used to prove that the Harish-Chandra's Schwartz space associated with some discrete groups of isometries of $δ$-hyperbolic spaces carries a natural structure of a convolution algebra. Then in the context of CAT(-1) spaces we show how our elementary techniques enable us to apply an equidisitribution theorem of T. Roblin to obtain informations about the decay of matrix coefficient of boundary representations associated with continuous functions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.