Paper detail

On the sixty-year periodicity in climate and astronomical series

In a recent article by Scafetta, 2010, the author investigates whether or not the decadal and multi-decadal climate oscillations have an astronomical origin. In particular, the author note that several global surface temperature records, since 1850, and records deduced from the orbits of the planets present very similar power spectra. Among the detected frequencies, large climate oscillations of about 20 and 60 years, respectively, appear synchronized to the orbital periods of Jupiter and Saturn. Other investigators have already noted that many climate, geophysical and astromomical data clearly show the appearance of a significant, approximately 60-year cycle. Of course, this cycle length is not exactly 60 years and varies by a few years (frequency band) between various climatic and astronomical phenomena. The main aim of the present research note is to further investigate the above results, considering different long-term time series and using a proper continuous wavelet analysis. In particular, we specifically consider the feature and importance of the sixty-year periodicity, in order to better build reliable models for climate predictions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.