Paper detail

On the shape of a convex body with respect to its second projection body

We prove results relative to the problem of finding sharp bounds for the affine invariant $P(K)=V(ΠK)/V^{d-1}(K)$. Namely, we prove that if $K$ is a 3-dimensional zonoid of volume 1, then its second projection body $Π^2K$ is contained in 8K, while if $K$ is any symmetric 3-dimensional convex body of volume 1, then $Π^2K$ contains 6K. Both inclusions are sharp. Consequences of these results include a stronger version of a reverse isoperimetric inequality for 3-dimensional zonoids-established by the author in a previous work, a reduction for the 3-dimensional Petty conjecture to another isoperimetric problem and the best known lower bound up to date for $P(K)$ in 3 dimensions. As byproduct of our methods, we establish an almost optimal lower bound for high-dimensional bodies of revolution.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.