Paper detail

On the Robustness and Anomaly Detection of Sparse Neural Networks

The robustness and anomaly detection capability of neural networks are crucial topics for their safe adoption in the real-world. Moreover, the over-parameterization of recent networks comes with high computational costs and raises questions about its influence on robustness and anomaly detection. In this work, we show that sparsity can make networks more robust and better anomaly detectors. To motivate this even further, we show that a pre-trained neural network contains, within its parameter space, sparse subnetworks that are better at these tasks without any further training. We also show that structured sparsity greatly helps in reducing the complexity of expensive robustness and detection methods, while maintaining or even improving their results on these tasks. Finally, we introduce a new method, SensNorm, which uses the sensitivity of weights derived from an appropriate pruning method to detect anomalous samples in the input.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.