Paper detail

On the risks of using double precision in numerical simulations of spatio-temporal chaos

Due to the butterfly-effect, computer-generated chaotic simulations often deviate exponentially from the true solution, so that it is very hard to obtain a reliable simulation of chaos in a long-duration time. In this paper, a new strategy of the so-called Clean Numerical Simulation (CNS) in physical space is proposed for spatio-temporal chaos, which is computationally much more efficient than its predecessor (in spectral space). The strategy of the CNS is to reduce both of the truncation and round-off errors to a specified level by implementing high-order algorithms in multiple-precision arithmetic (with sufficient significant digits for all variables and parameters) so as to guarantee that numerical noise is below such a critical level in a temporal interval $t\in[0,T_c]$ that corresponding numerical simulation remains reliable over the whole interval. Without loss of generality, the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation (CGLE) is used to illustrate its validity. As a result, a reliable long-duration numerical simulation of the CGLE is achieved in the whole spatial domain over a long interval of time $t\in[0,3000]$, which is used as a reliable benchmark solution to investigate the influence of numerical noise by comparing it with the corresponding ones given by the 4th-order Runge-Kutta method in double precision (RKwD). Our results demonstrate that the use of double precision in simulations of chaos might lead to huge errors in the prediction of spatio-temporal trajectories and in statistics, not only quantitatively but also qualitatively, particularly in a long interval of time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.