Paper detail

On the Rise and Fall of Online Social Networks

The rise and fall of online social networks recently generated an enormous amount of interest among people, both inside and outside of academia. Gillette [Businessweek magazine, 2011] did a detailed analysis of MySpace, which started losing its popularity since 2008. Cannarella and Spechler [ArXiv, 2014] used a model of disease spread to explain the rise and fall of MySpace. In this paper, we present a graph theoretical model that may be able to provide an alternative explanation for the rise and fall of online social networks. Our model is motivated by the well-known Barabasi-Albert model of generating random scale-free networks using preferential attachment or `rich-gets-richer' phenomenon. As shown by our empirical analysis, we conjecture that such an online social network growth model is inherently flawed as it fails to maintain the stability of such networks while ensuring their growth. In the process, we also conjecture that our model of preferential attachment also exhibits scale-free phenomenon.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.