Paper detail

On the rigidity of moduli of curves in arbitrary characteristic

The stack $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ of stable curves and its coarse moduli space $\overline{M}_{g,n}$ are defined over $\mathbb{Z}$, and therefore over any field. Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Hacking showed that $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ is rigid (a conjecture of Kapranov). Bruno and Mella for $g=0$, and the second author for $g\geq 1$ showed that its automorphism group is the symmetric group $S_n$, permuting marked points unless $(g,n)\in\{(0,4),(1,1),(1,2)\}$. The methods used in the papers above do not extend to positive characteristic. We show that in characteristic $p>0$, the rigidity of $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$, with the same exceptions as over $\mathbb{C}$, implies that its automorphism group is $S_n$. We prove that, over any perfect field, $\overline{M}_{0,n}$ is rigid and deduce that, over any field, $Aut(\overline{M}_{0,n})\cong S_{n}$ for $n\geq 5$. Going back to characteristic zero, we prove that for $g+n>4$, the coarse moduli space $\overline M_{g,n}$ is rigid, extending a result of Hacking who had proven it has no locally trivial deformations. Finally, we show that $\overline{M}_{1,2}$ is not rigid, although it does not admit locally trivial deformations, by explicitly computing his Kuranishi family.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.