On the rigidity of moduli of curves in arbitrary characteristic

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

The stack M‾g,n\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n} of stable curves and its coarse moduli space M‾g,n\overline{M}_{g,n} are defined over Z\mathbb{Z}, and therefore over any field. Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Hacking showed that M‾g,n\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n} is rigid (a conjecture of Kapranov). Bruno and Mella for g=0g=0, and the second author for g≥1g\geq 1 showed that its automorphism group is the symmetric group SnS_n, permuting marked points unless (g,n)∈{(0,4),(1,1),(1,2)}(g,n)\in\{(0,4),(1,1),(1,2)\}. The methods used in the papers above do not extend to positive characteristic. We show that in characteristic p>0p>0, the rigidity of M‾g,n\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}, with the same exceptions as over C\mathbb{C}, implies that its automorphism group is SnS_n. We prove that, over any perfect field, M‾0,n\overline{M}_{0,n} is rigid and deduce that, over any field, Aut(M‾0,n)≅SnAut(\overline{M}_{0,n})\cong S_{n} for n≥5n\geq 5. Going back to characteristic zero, we prove that for g+n>4g+n>4, the coarse moduli space M‾g,n\overline M_{g,n} is rigid, extending a result of Hacking who had proven it has no locally trivial deformations. Finally, we show that M‾1,2\overline{M}_{1,2} is not rigid, although it does not admit locally trivial deformations, by explicitly computing his Kuranishi family.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.