Paper detail

On the reliability of recent Monte Carlo studies of dilute systems of localized spins interacting with itinerant carriers

In this paper, we discuss magnetic properties of dilute systems of localized spins interacting with itinerant carriers. More precisely, we compare recent available Monte Carlo results with our two step approach (TSA) calculations. The TSA consists first on the determination of the magnetic couplings and then on a proper treatment of the resulting effective dilute Heisenberg Hamiltonian. We show important disagreement between the Monte Carlo results (in principle exact) and our TSA calculations. We analyze the origins and shed light on the reasons of those dissensions. In contrast to one could expect, we demonstrate that the available MC calculations suffer from severe numerical shortcomings. More precisely, (i) the finite size effects appear to be huge in dilute systems, (ii) the statistical sampling (disorder configurations) was far too small, and (iii) the determination of the Curie temperature was too rough. In addition, we provide new arguments to explain a recent disagreement between the Monte Carlo simulations and TSA for the model study of the well known III-V diluted magnetic semiconductor Ga$_{1-x}$Mn$_{x}$As. We hope that this work will motivate new systematic large scale Monte Carlo calculations.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.