Paper detail

On the Relationship between Treatment Effect Heterogeneity and the Variability Ratio Effect Size Statistic

Recently, the variability ratio (VR) effect size statistic has been used with increasing frequency in the study of differences in variation of a measured variable between two study populations. More specifically, the VR effect size statistic allows for the detection of treatment effect heterogeneity (TEH) of medical interventions. While a VR that is different from 1 is widely acknowledged to implicate a treatment effect heterogeneity (TEH) the exact relationship between those two quantities has not been discussed in detail thus far. In this note we derive a precise connection between TEH and VR. In particular, we derive precise upper and lower bounds on the TEH in terms of VR. Moreover, we provide an exemplary simulation for which VR is equal to 1 and there exist TEH. Our result has implications for the interpretation of VR effect size estimates regarding its connection to treatment effect heterogeneity of (medical) interventions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.