Paper detail

On the Relation Between Opinion Change and Information Consumption on Reddit

While much attention has been devoted to the causes of opinion change, little is known about its consequences. Our study sheds a light on the relationship between one user's opinion change episode and subsequent behavioral change on an online social media, Reddit. In particular, we look at r/ChangeMyView, an online community dedicated to debating one's own opinions. Interestingly, this forum adopts a well-codified schema for explicitly self-reporting opinion change. Starting from this ground truth, we analyze changes in future online information consumption behavior that arise after a self-reported opinion change on sociopolitical topics; and in particular, operationalized in this work as the participation to sociopolitical subreddits. Such participation profile is important as it represents one's information diet, and is a reliable proxy for, e.g., political affiliation or health choices. We find that people who report an opinion change are significantly more likely to change their future participation in a specific subset of online communities. We characterize which communities are more likely to be abandoned after opinion change, and find a significant association (r=0.46) between propaganda-like language used in a community and the increase in chances of leaving it. We find comparable results (r=0.39) for the opposite direction, i.e., joining a community. This finding suggests how propagandistic communities act as a first gateway to internalize a shift in one's sociopolitical opinion. Finally, we show that the textual content of the discussion associated with opinion change is indicative of which communities are going to be subject to a participation change. In fact, a predictive model based only on the opinion change post is able to pinpoint these communities with an AP@5 of 0.20, similar to what can be reached by using all the past history of participation in communities.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.