Paper detail

On the range of the Douglas-Rachford operator

The problem of finding a minimizer of the sum of two convex functions - or, more generally, that of finding a zero of the sum of two maximally monotone operators - is of central importance in variational analysis. Perhaps the most popular method of solving this problem is the Douglas-Rachford splitting method. Surprisingly, little is known about the range of the Douglas-Rachford operator. In this paper, we set out to study this range systematically. We prove that for 3* monotone operators a very pleasing formula can be found that reveals the range to be nearly equal to a simple set involving the domains and ranges of the underlying operators. A similar formula holds for the range of the corresponding displacement mapping. We discuss applications to subdifferential operators, to the infimal displacement vector, and to firmly nonexpansive mappings. Various examples and counter-examples are presented, including some concerning the celebrated Brezis-Haraux theorem.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.