Paper detail

On the Performance of Reed-Muller Codes Over $(d,\infty)$-RLL Input-Constrained BMS Channels

This paper considers the input-constrained binary memoryless symmetric (BMS) channel, without feedback. The channel input sequence respects the $(d,\infty)$-runlength limited (RLL) constraint, which mandates that any pair of successive $1$s be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. We consider the problem of designing explicit codes for such channels. In particular, we work with the Reed-Muller (RM) family of codes, which were shown by Reeves and Pfister (2021) to achieve the capacity of any unconstrained BMS channel, under bit-MAP decoding. We show that it is possible to pick $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes of a capacity-achieving (over the unconstrained BMS channel) sequence of RM codes such that the subcodes achieve, under bit-MAP decoding, rates of $C\cdot{2^{-\left \lceil \log_2(d+1)\right \rceil}}$, where $C$ is the capacity of the BMS channel. Finally, we also introduce techniques for upper bounding the rate of any $(1,\infty)$-RLL subcode of a specific capacity-achieving sequence of RM codes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.