BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

V. Arvind Rameshwar

V. Arvind Rameshwar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Bounding User Contributions for User-Level Differentially Private Mean Estimation

We revisit the problem of releasing the sample mean of bounded samples in a dataset, privately, under user-level $\varepsilon$-differential privacy (DP). We aim to derive the optimal method of preprocessing data samples, within a canonical class of processing strategies, in terms of the error in estimation. Typical error analyses of such \emph{bounding} (or \emph{clipping}) strategies in the literature assume that the data samples are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), and sometimes also that all users contribute the same number of samples (data homogeneity) -- assumptions that do not accurately model real-world data distributions. Our main result in this work is a precise characterization of the preprocessing strategy that gives rise to the smallest \emph{worst-case} error over all datasets -- a \emph{distribution-independent} error metric -- while allowing for data heterogeneity. We also show via experimental studies that even for i.i.d. real-valued samples, our clipping strategy performs much better, in terms of \emph{average-case} error, than the widely used bounding strategy of Amin et al. (2019).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

On the Error Probability of RPA Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes over BMS Channels

We analyze the performance of the Recursive Projection-Aggregation (RPA) decoder of Ye and Abbe (2020), for Reed-Muller (RM) codes, over general binary memoryless symmetric (BMS) channels. Our work is a significant generalization of a recent result of Rameshwar and Lalitha (2025) that showed that the RPA decoder provably achieves vanishing error probabilities for "low-rate" RM codes, over the binary symmetric channel (BSC). While a straightforward generalization of the proof strategy in that paper will require additional, restrictive assumptions on the BMS channel, our technique, which employs an equivalence between the RPA projection operation and a part of the "channel combining" phase in polar codes, requires no such assumptions. Interestingly, such an equivalence allows for the use of a generic union bound on the error probability of the first-order RM code (the "base case" of the RPA decoder), under maximum-likelihood decoding, which holds for any BMS channel. We then exploit these observations in the proof strategy outlined in the work of Rameshwar and Lalitha (2025), and argue that, much like in the case of the BSC, one can obtain vanishing error probabilities, in the large $n$ limit (where $n$ is the blocklength), for RM orders that scale roughly as $\log \log n$, for all BMS channels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Feedback Capacity-Achieving Coding Scheme for the $(d,\infty)$-RLL Input-Constrained Binary Erasure Channel

This paper considers the memoryless input-constrained binary erasure channel (BEC). The channel input constraint is the $(d,\infty)$-runlength limited (RLL) constraint, which mandates that any pair of successive $1$s in the input sequence be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. We consider a scenario where there is causal, noiseless feedback from the decoder. We demonstrate a simple, labelling-based, zero-error feedback coding scheme, which we prove to be feedback capacity-achieving, and, as a by-product, obtain an explicit characterization of the feedback capacity. Our proof is based on showing that the rate of our feedback coding scheme equals an upper bound on the feedback capacity derived using the single-letter bounding techniques of Sabag et al. (2017). Further, we note using the tools of Thangaraj (2017) that there is a gap between the feedback and non-feedback capacities of the $(d,\infty)$-RLL input constrained BEC, at least for $d=1,2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Linear Runlength-Limited Subcodes of Reed-Muller Codes and Coding Schemes for Input-Constrained BMS Channels

In this work, we address the question of the largest rate of linear subcodes of Reed-Muller (RM) codes, all of whose codewords respect a runlength-limited (RLL) constraint. Our interest is in the $(d,\infty)$-RLL constraint, which mandates that every pair of successive $1$s be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. Consider any sequence $\{{\mathcal{C}_m}\}_{m\geq 1}$ of RM codes with increasing blocklength, whose rates approach $R$, in the limit as the blocklength goes to infinity. We show that for any linear $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcode, $\hat{\mathcal{C}}_m$, of the code $\mathcal{C}_m$, it holds that the rate of $\hat{\mathcal{C}}_m$ is at most $\frac{R}{d+1}$, in the limit as the blocklength goes to infinity. We also consider scenarios where the coordinates of the RM codes are not ordered according to the standard lexicographic ordering, and derive rate upper bounds for linear $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes, in those cases as well. Next, for the setting of a $(d,\infty)$-RLL input-constrained binary memoryless symmetric (BMS) channel, we devise a new coding scheme, based on cosets of RM codes. Again, in the limit of blocklength going to infinity, this code outperforms any linear subcode of an RM code, in terms of rate, for low noise regimes of the channel.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Performance of Reed-Muller Codes Over $(d,\infty)$-RLL Input-Constrained BMS Channels

This paper considers the input-constrained binary memoryless symmetric (BMS) channel, without feedback. The channel input sequence respects the $(d,\infty)$-runlength limited (RLL) constraint, which mandates that any pair of successive $1$s be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. We consider the problem of designing explicit codes for such channels. In particular, we work with the Reed-Muller (RM) family of codes, which were shown by Reeves and Pfister (2021) to achieve the capacity of any unconstrained BMS channel, under bit-MAP decoding. We show that it is possible to pick $(d,\infty)$-RLL subcodes of a capacity-achieving (over the unconstrained BMS channel) sequence of RM codes such that the subcodes achieve, under bit-MAP decoding, rates of $C\cdot{2^{-\left \lceil \log_2(d+1)\right \rceil}}$, where $C$ is the capacity of the BMS channel. Finally, we also introduce techniques for upper bounding the rate of any $(1,\infty)$-RLL subcode of a specific capacity-achieving sequence of RM codes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Bounds on the Feedback Capacity of the $(d,\infty)$-RLL Input-Constrained Binary Erasure Channel

The paper considers the input-constrained binary erasure channel (BEC) with causal, noiseless feedback. The channel input sequence respects the $(d,\infty)$-runlength limited (RLL) constraint, i.e., any pair of successive $1$s must be separated by at least $d$ $0$s. We derive upper and lower bounds on the feedback capacity of this channel, for all $d\geq 1$, given by: $\max\limits_{δ\in [0,\frac{1}{d+1}]}R(δ) \leq C^{\text{fb}}_{(d\infty)}(ε) \leq \max\limits_{δ\in [0,\frac{1}{1+dε}]}R(δ)$, where the function $R(δ) = \frac{h_b(δ)}{dδ+ \frac{1}{1-ε}}$, with $ε\in [0,1]$ denoting the channel erasure probability, and $h_b(\cdot)$ being the binary entropy function. We note that our bounds are tight for the case when $d=1$ (see Sabag et al. (2016)), and, in addition, we demonstrate that for the case when $d=2$, the feedback capacity is equal to the capacity with non-causal knowledge of erasures, for $ε\in [0,1-\frac{1}{2\log(3/2)}]$. For $d>1$, our bounds differ from the non-causal capacities (which serve as upper bounds on the feedback capacity) derived in Peled et al. (2019) in only the domains of maximization. The approach in this paper follows Sabag et al. (2017), by deriving single-letter bounds on the feedback capacity, based on output distributions supported on a finite $Q$-graph, which is a directed graph with edges labelled by output symbols.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Computable Lower Bounds for Capacities of Input-Driven Finite-State Channels

This paper studies the capacities of input-driven finite-state channels, i.e., channels whose current state is a time-invariant deterministic function of the previous state and the current input. We lower bound the capacity of such a channel using a dynamic programming formulation of a bound on the maximum reverse directed information rate. We show that the dynamic programming-based bounds can be simplified by solving the corresponding Bellman equation explicitly. In particular, we provide analytical lower bounds on the capacities of $(d, k)$-runlength-limited input-constrained binary symmetric and binary erasure channels. Furthermore, we provide a single-letter lower bound based on a class of input distributions with memory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access