On the p−p-Bergman theory

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to develop a general p−p-Bergman theory on bounded domains in Cn\mathbb C^n. To indicate the basic difference between LpL^p and L2L^2 cases, we show that the p−p-Bergman kernel Kp(z)K_p(z) is not real-analytic on some bounded complete Reinhardt domains when p≥4p\ge 4 is an even number. By the calculus of variations we get a fundamental reproducing formula. This together with certain techniques from nonlinear analysis of the p−p-Laplacian yield a number of results, e.g., the off-diagonal p−p-Bergman kernel Kp(z,⋅)K_p(z,\cdot) is Hölder continuous of order 12\frac12 for p>1p>1 and of order 12(n+2)\frac1{2(n+2)} for p=1p=1. We also show that the p−p-Bergman metric Bp(z;X)B_p(z;X) tends to the Carathéodory metric C(z;X)C(z;X) as p→∞p\rightarrow \infty and the generalized Levi form i∂∂ˉlog⁡Kp(z;X)i\partial\bar{\partial}\log K_p(z;X) is no less than Bp(z;X)2B_p(z;X)^2 for p≥2p\ge 2 and C(z;X)2 C(z;X)^2 for p≤2.p\le 2. Stability of Kp(z,w)K_p(z,w) or Bp(z;X)B_p(z;X) as pp varies, boundary behavior of Kp(z)K_p(z), as well as basic facts on the p−p-Bergman prjection, are also investigated.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.