Paper detail

On the $p-$Bergman theory

In this paper we attempt to develop a general $p-$Bergman theory on bounded domains in $\mathbb C^n$. To indicate the basic difference between $L^p$ and $L^2$ cases, we show that the $p-$Bergman kernel $K_p(z)$ is not real-analytic on some bounded complete Reinhardt domains when $p\ge 4$ is an even number. By the calculus of variations we get a fundamental reproducing formula. This together with certain techniques from nonlinear analysis of the $p-$Laplacian yield a number of results, e.g., the off-diagonal $p-$Bergman kernel $K_p(z,\cdot)$ is Hölder continuous of order $\frac12$ for $p>1$ and of order $\frac1{2(n+2)}$ for $p=1$. We also show that the $p-$Bergman metric $B_p(z;X)$ tends to the Carathéodory metric $C(z;X)$ as $p\rightarrow \infty$ and the generalized Levi form $i\partial\bar{\partial}\log K_p(z;X)$ is no less than $B_p(z;X)^2$ for $p\ge 2$ and $ C(z;X)^2$ for $p\le 2.$ Stability of $K_p(z,w)$ or $B_p(z;X)$ as $p$ varies, boundary behavior of $K_p(z)$, as well as basic facts on the $p-$Bergman prjection, are also investigated.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.