Paper detail

On the optimality of the aggregate with exponential weights for low temperatures

Given a finite class of functions F, the problem of aggregation is to construct a procedure with a risk as close as possible to the risk of the best element in the class. A classical procedure (PAC-Bayesian statistical learning theory (2004) Paris 6, Statistical Learning Theory and Stochastic Optimization (2001) Springer, Ann. Statist. 28 (2000) 75-87) is the aggregate with exponential weights (AEW), defined by \[\tilde{f}^{\mathrm{AEW}}=\sum_{f\in F}\hatθ(f)f,\qquad where \hatθ(f)=\frac{\exp(-({n}/{T})R_n(f))}{\sum_{g\in F}\exp(-({n}/{T})R_n(g))},\] where $T>0$ is called the temperature parameter and $R_n(\cdot)$ is an empirical risk. In this article, we study the optimality of the AEW in the regression model with random design and in the low-temperature regime. We prove three properties of AEW. First, we show that AEW is a suboptimal aggregation procedure in expectation with respect to the quadratic risk when $T\leq c_1$, where $c_1$ is an absolute positive constant (the low-temperature regime), and that it is suboptimal in probability even for high temperatures. Second, we show that as the cardinality of the dictionary grows, the behavior of AEW might deteriorate, namely, that in the low-temperature regime it might concentrate with high probability around elements in the dictionary with risk greater than the risk of the best function in the dictionary by at least an order of $1/\sqrt{n}$. Third, we prove that if a geometric condition on the dictionary (the so-called "Bernstein condition) is assumed, then AEW is indeed optimal both in high probability and in expectation in the low-temperature regime. Moreover, under that assumption, the complexity term is essentially the logarithm of the cardinality of the set of "almost minimizers" rather than the logarithm of the cardinality of the entire dictionary. This result holds for small values of the temperature parameter, thus complementing an analogous result for high temperatures.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.