Paper detail

On the Modified Einstein-Laub and Modified Chu Optical Force Formulations

In several experiments involving material background, it has been observed that the Chu, Einstein-Laub and Ampere formulations of optical force lead to either different optical forces or wrong total optical force. In order to identify the exact reason behind such significant disagreements, we investigate the optical force in a number of tractor beam and lateral force experiments. We demonstrate that the modified Einstein-Laub or modified Chu formulations, obtained from two mathematical consistency conditions of force calculation, give the time-averaged force that agrees with the experiments. We consider both the chiral and achiral objects embedded in complex material backgrounds. Though the distinct formulations of optical force have been made mathematically equivalent in this work; the aspect of physical consistency of these distinct optical force formulations have also been investigated. It is known that the theory of Minkowski suggests zero bulk force inside a lossless object for which we still do not have any experimental verification. In contrast, both modified Einstein-Laub and modified Chu force formulations suggest non-zero bulk force inside a lossless object. Hence, for a future resolution of this discrepancy, we also suggest a possible experiment to investigate the bulk force and to check the validity of these distinct formulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.