Paper detail

On the mean value property of fractional harmonic functions

As well known, harmonic functions satisfy the mean value property, namely the average of the function over a ball is equal to its value at the center. This fact naturally raises the question on whether this is a characterizing feature of balls, namely whether a set for which all harmonic functions satisfy the mean value property is necessarily a ball. This question was investigated by several authors, and was finally elegantly, completely and positively settled by Ülkü Kuran, with an artful use of elementary techniques. This classical problem has been recently fleshed out by Giovanni Cupini, Nicola Fusco, Ermanno Lanconelli and Xiao Zhong who proved a quantitative stability result for the mean value formula, showing that a suitable "mean value gap" (measuring the normalized difference between the average of harmonic functions on a given set and their pointwise value) is bounded from below by the Lebesgue measure of the "gap" between the set and the ball (and, consequently, by the Fraenkel asymmetry of the set). That is, if a domain "almost" satisfies the mean value property, then it must be necessarily close to a ball. Here we investigate the nonlocal counterparts of these results. In particular we will prove a classification result and a stability result, establishing that: if fractional harmonic functions enjoy a suitable exterior average property for a given domain, then the domain is necessarily a ball, a suitable "nonlocal mean value gap" is bounded from below by an appropriate measure of the difference between the set and the ball. Differently from the classical case, some of our arguments rely on purely nonlocal properties, with no classical counterpart, such as the fact that "all functions are locally fractional harmonic up to a small error".

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.