Paper detail

On the mathematically reliable long-term simulation of chaos of Lorenz equation in the interval [0,10000]

Using 1200 CPUs of the National Supercomputer TH-A1 and a parallel integral algorithm based on the 3500th-order Taylor expansion and the 4180-digit multiple precision data, we have done a reliable simulation of chaotic solution of Lorenz equation in a rather long interval [0,10000] (Lorenz time unit). Such a kind of mathematically reliable chaotic simulation has never been reported. It provides us a numerical benchmark for mathematically reliable long-term prediction of chaos. Besides, it also proposes a safe method for mathematically reliable simulations of chaos in a finite but long enough interval. In addition, our very fine simulations suggest that such a kind of mathematically reliable long-term prediction of chaotic solution might have no physical meanings, because the inherent physical micro-level uncertainty due to thermal fluctuation might quickly transfer into macroscopic uncertainty so that trajectories for a long enough time would be essentially uncertain in physics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.