Paper detail

On the Log-Likelihood Ratio Evaluation of CWCU Linear and Widely Linear MMSE Data Estimators

In soft decoding of data bits, the log-likelihood ratios are evaluated from the estimated data symbols. For proper constellation diagrams such as QPSK or 16-QAM, these data symbols are often estimated using the linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) estimator. The LMMSE estimator only fulfills the weak Bayesian unbiasedness constraint. Recently, estimators fulfilling the more stringent component-wise conditionally unbiased (CWCU) constraints have been investigated, such as the CWCU LMMSE estimator. In this paper, we prove that the CWCU LMMSE estimates result in the very same log-likelihood ratios as the LMMSE estimates. For improper constellation diagrams such as 8-QAM, widely linear estimators are used. For this case, we show that the widely linear versions of the LMMSE estimator and the CWCU LMMSE estimator also yield identical log-likelihood ratios. Finally, we give a simulation example which illustrates a number of interesting properties of the discussed widely linear estimators.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.