On the K(π,1)K(π, 1)-problem for restrictions of complex reflection arrangements

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let W⊂GL(V)W\subset GL(V) be a complex reflection group, and A(W){\mathscr A}(W) the set of the mirrors of the complex reflections in WW. It is known that the complement X(A(W))X({\mathscr A}(W)) of the reflection arrangement A(W){\mathscr A}(W) is a K(π,1)K(π,1) space. For YY an intersection of hyperplanes in A(W)\mathscr A(W), let X(A(W)Y)X(\mathscr A(W)^Y) be the complement in YY of the hyperplanes in A(W)\mathscr A(W) not containing YY. We hope that X(A(W)Y)X(\mathscr A(W)^Y) is always a K(π,1)K(π,1). We prove it in case of the monomial groups W=G(r,p,ℓ)W = G(r,p,\ell). Using known results, we then show that there remain only three irreducible complex reflection groups, leading to just eight such induced arrangements for which this K(π,1)K(π,1) property remains to be proved.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.