Paper detail

On the impossibility of constructing good population mean estimators in a realistic Respondent Driven Sampling model

Current methods for population mean estimation from data collected by Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) are based on the Horvitz-Thompson estimator together with a set of assumptions on the sampling model under which the inclusion probabilities can be determined from the information contained in the data. In this paper, we argue that such set of assumptions are too simplistic to be realistic and that under realistic sampling models, the situation is far more complicated. Specifically, we study a realistic RDS sampling model that is motivated by a real world RDS dataset. We show that, for this model, the inclusion probabilities, which are necessary for the application of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator, can not be determined by the information in the sample alone. An implication is that, unless additional information about the underlying population network is obtained, it is hopeless to conceive of a general theory of population mean estimation from current RDS data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.