Paper detail

On the Identifiability of Latent Models for Dependent Data

The condition of parameter identifiability is essential for the consistency of all estimators and is often challenging to prove. As a consequence, this condition is often assumed for simplicity although this may not be straightforward to assume for a variety of model settings. In this paper we deal with a particular class of models that we refer to as "latent" models which can be defined as models made by the sum of underlying models, such as a variety of linear state-space models for time series. These models are of great importance in many fields, from ecology to engineering, and in this paper we prove the identifiability of a wide class of (second-order stationary) latent time series and spatial models and discuss what this implies for some extremum estimators, thereby reducing the conditions for their consistency to some very basic regularity conditions. Finally, a specific focus is given to the Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments estimator which is also able to estimate intrinsically second-order stationary models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.