Paper detail

On the Hofer geometry injectivity radius conjecture

We verify here some variants of topological and dynamical flavor of the injectivity radius conjecture in Hofer geometry, Lalonde-Savelyev \cite{citeLalondeSavelyevOntheinjectivityradiusinHofergeometry} in the case of $Ham (S^2)$ and $Ham(Σ, ω)$, for $Σ$ a closed positive genus surface. In particular we show that any loop in $Ham (S^2)$, respectively $Ham(Σ, ω)$ with $L ^{+}$ Hofer length less than $area(S ^{2} )/2$, respectively any $L ^{+} $ length is contractible through ($L ^{+} $) Hofer shorter loops, in the $C ^{\infty} $ topology. We also prove some stronger variants of this statement on the loop space level. One dynamical type corollary is that there are no smooth, positive Morse index (Ustilovsky) geodesics, in $Ham (S^2)$, respectively in $Ham(Σ, ω)$ with $L ^{+} $ Hofer length less than $area (S ^{2} )/2$, respectively any length. The above condition on the geodesics can be expanded as an explicit and elementary dynamical condition on the associated Hamiltonian flow. We also give some speculations on connections of this later result with curvature properties of the Hamiltonian diffeomorphism group of surfaces.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.