Paper detail

On the growth constant for square-lattice self-avoiding walks

The growth constant for two-dimensional self-avoiding walks on the honeycomb lattice was conjectured by Nienhuis in 1982, and since that time the corresponding results for the square and triangular lattices have been sought. For the square lattice, a possible conjecture was advanced by one of us (AJG) more than 20 years ago, based on the six significant digit estimate available at the time. This estimate has improved by a further six digits over the intervening decades, and the conjectured value continued to agree with the increasingly precise estimates. We discuss the three most successful methods for estimating the growth constant, including the most recently developed Topological Transfer-Matrix method, due to another of us (JLJ). We show this to be the most computationally efficient of the three methods, and by parallelising the algorithm we have estimated the growth constant significantly more precisely, incidentally ruling out the conjecture, which fails in the 12th digit. Our new estimate of the growth constant is $$μ(\mathrm{square}) = 2.63815853032790\, (3).$$

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.