Paper detail

On the estimation of statistical uncertainties on powder diffraction and small angle scattering data from 2-D x-ray detectors

This paper explores optimal methods for obtaining one-dimensional (1D) powder pattern intensities from two-dimensional (2D) planar detectors with good estimates of their standard deviations. We describe methods to estimate uncertainties when the same image is measured in multiple frames as well as from a single frame. We show the importance of considering the correlation of diffraction points during the integration and the re-sampling process of data analysis. We find that correlations between adjacent pixels in the image can lead to seriously overestimated uncertainties if it is neglected in the integration process. Off-diagonal entries in the variance-covariance (VC) matrix are problematic as virtually all data processing and modeling programs cannot handle the full VC matrix. We show the off-diagonal terms come mainly from the pixel splitting algorithm used as the default integration algorithm in many popular 2D integration programs, as well as from re-binning and re-sampling steps later in the processing. When the full VC matrix can be propagated during the data reduction, it is possible to get accurate refined parameters and their uncertainties at the cost of increasing computational complexity. However, as this is not normally possible, we explore the best approximate methods for data processing in order to estimate uncertainties on refined parameters with the greatest accuracy from just the diagonal variance terms in the VC matrix.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.