Paper detail

On the energy efficiency of client-centric data consistency management under random read/write access to Big Data with Apache HBase

The total estimated energy bill for data centers in 2010 was \$11.5 billion, and experts estimate that the energy cost of a typical data center doubles every five years. On the other hand, computational developments have started to lag behind storage advancements, therein becoming a future bottleneck for the ongoing data growth which already approaches Exascale levels. We investigate the relationship among data throughput and energy footprint on a large storage cluster, with the goal of formalizing it as a metric that reflects the trading among consistency and energy. Employing a client-centric consistency approach, and while honouring ACID properties of the chosen columnar store for the case study (Apache HBase), we present the factors involved in the energy consumption of the system as well as lessons learned to underpin further design of energy-efficient cluster scale storage systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.