Paper detail

On the Efficiency of Entropic Regularized Algorithms for Optimal Transport

We present several new complexity results for the entropic regularized algorithms that approximately solve the optimal transport (OT) problem between two discrete probability measures with at most $n$ atoms. First, we improve the complexity bound of a greedy variant of Sinkhorn, known as \textit{Greenkhorn}, from $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-3})$ to $\widetilde{O}(n^2\varepsilon^{-2})$. Notably, our result can match the best known complexity bound of Sinkhorn and help clarify why Greenkhorn significantly outperforms Sinkhorn in practice in terms of row/column updates as observed by~\citet{Altschuler-2017-Near}. Second, we propose a new algorithm, which we refer to as \textit{APDAMD} and which generalizes an adaptive primal-dual accelerated gradient descent (APDAGD) algorithm~\citep{Dvurechensky-2018-Computational} with a prespecified mirror mapping $ϕ$. We prove that APDAMD achieves the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^2\sqrtδ\varepsilon^{-1})$ in which $δ>0$ stands for the regularity of $ϕ$. In addition, we show by a counterexample that the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(\min\{n^{9/4}\varepsilon^{-1}, n^2\varepsilon^{-2}\})$ proved for APDAGD before is invalid and give a refined complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/2}\varepsilon^{-1})$. Further, we develop a \textit{deterministic} accelerated variant of Sinkhorn via appeal to estimated sequence and prove the complexity bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/3}\varepsilon^{-4/3})$. As such, we see that accelerated variant of Sinkhorn outperforms Sinkhorn and Greenkhorn in terms of $1/\varepsilon$ and APDAGD and accelerated alternating minimization (AAM)~\citep{Guminov-2021-Combination} in terms of $n$. Finally, we conduct the experiments on synthetic and real data and the numerical results show the efficiency of Greenkhorn, APDAMD and accelerated Sinkhorn in practice.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.