Paper detail

On the effectiveness of local vortex identification criteria in the compressed representation of wall-bounded turbulence

Compressing complex flows into a tangle of vortex filaments is the basic implication of the classical notion of the vortex representation. Various vortex identification criteria have been proposed to extract the vortex filaments from available velocity fields, which is an essential procedure in the practice of the vortex representation. This work focuses on the effectiveness of those identification criteria in the compressed representation of wall-bounded turbulence. Five local identification criteria regarding the vortex strength and three criteria for the vortex axis are considered. To facilitate the comparisons, this work first non-dimensionalize the criteria of the vortex strength based on their dimensions and root mean squares, with corresponding equivalent thresholds prescribed. The optimal definition for the vortex vector is discussed by trialling all the possible combinations of the identification criteria for the vortex strength and the vortex axis. The effectiveness of those criteria in the compressed representation is evaluated based on two principles: (1) efficient compression, which implies the less information required, the better for the representation; (2) accurate decompression, which stresses that the original velocity fields could be reconstructed based on the vortex representation in high accuracy. In practice, the alignment of the identified vortex axis and vortex isosurface, and the accuracy for decompressed velocity fields based on those criteria are quantitatively compared. The alignment degree is described by using the differential geometry method, and the decompressing process is implemented via the two-dimensional field-based linear stochastic estimation. The results of this work provide some reference for the applications of vortex identification criteria in wall-bounded turbulence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.