Paper detail

On the derived DG functors

Assume that abelian categories $A, B$ over a field admit countable direct limits and that these limits are exact. Let $F: D^+_{dg}(A) --> D^+_{dg}(B)$ be a DG quasi-functor such that the functor $Ho(F): D^+(A) \to D^+(B)$ carries $D^{\geq 0}(A)$ to $D^{\geq 0}(B)$ and such that, for every $i>0$, the functor $H^i F: A \to B$ is effaceable. We prove that $F$ is canonically isomorphic to the right derived DG functor $RH^0(F)$. We also prove a similar result for bounded derived DG categories in a more general setting. We give an example showing that the corresponding statements for triangulated functors are false. We prove a formula that expresses Hochschild cohomology of the categories $ D^b_{dg}(A)$, $ D^+_{dg}(A) $ as the $Ext$ groups in the abelian category of left exact functors $A \to Ind B$ .

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.