Paper detail

On the dark matter as a geometric effect in $f(\mathcal{R})$ gravity

A mysterious type of matter is supposed to exist, because the observed rotational velocity curves of particle moving around the galactic center and the expected rotational velocity curves do not match. There are also a number of proposals in the modified gravity for this discrepancy. In this contrast, in $2008$, B$\ddot{\text{o}}$hmer et al. presented an interesting idea in (Astropart Phys 29(6):386-392, 2008) where they showed that a $f(\mathcal{R})$ gravity model could actually explain dark matter to be a geometric effect only. They solved the gravitational field equations in vacuum using generic $f(\mathcal{R})$ gravity model for constant velocity regions and found that the resulting modifications in the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian is of the form $\mathcal{R}^{1+m}$, where $m=V_{tg}^2/c^2$; $V_{tg}$ being the tangential velocity of the test particle moving around galactic dark matter region and, $c$, the speed of light. From observations it is known that $m\approx\mathcal{O}(10^{-6})$. In this article, we perform two things (1) We show that the form of $f(\mathcal{R})$ they claimed is not correct. In doing the calculations, we found that when the radial component of the metric for constant velocity regions is a constant then the exact solutions for $f(\mathcal{R})$ obtained is of the form of $\mathcal{R}^{1-α}$ which corresponds to a negative correction rather than positive, $α$ is a function of $m$. (2) We also show that we can not have an analytic solution of $f(\mathcal{R})$ for all values of tangential velocity including the observed value of tangential velocity $200-300$Km/s if the radial coefficient of the metric which describes the dark matter regions is \emph{not a constant}. Thus, we have to rely on the numerical solutions to get an approximate model for dark matter in $f(\mathcal{R})$ gravity.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.